
According to their press release leaked internal memo [Ed: you’re posting this just because you’re excited to have been included on a press release, right? –Sorry, I couldn’t resist the pull of real press acknowledgment. minor gossip], the Seattle Weekly took home a few mantlesfull of awards from the Society for Professional Journalists [spj.org]. Heady on the adrenaline of winning like crazy, the paper used the victories as an occasion for snark:
Seattle Weekly dominated the competition among alternative weeklies in five states with 19 awards and among non-daily newspapers in Western Washington state with 34 awards . . . In all, the paper won 54 SPJ awards for articles published in 2004. Among alt-weeklies in Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Montana, and Alaska, the next-biggest winner was [Ed: Pulitzer Prize Winning] Portland’s Willamette Week with 11. Seattle Weekly’s direct competitor, The Stranger, won an honorable mention, which was awarded to a former SW staffer and was that paper’s sole honor in either contest.
While the paper is to be congratulated for their success, it’s comments like these that sort of explain why the kid at the top of the class isn’t always the most popular.
update: In case the tone of this post didn’t convey my impression that the prizes just might be vanity awards for the purpose of ego-boosting, here’s Dan Savage’s rebuttal to the Seattle Weekly’s victory party and explanation of why the Stranger didn’t take home any awards (because they didn’t enter). [slog] (p.s. Dan wrote that he sent me an e-mail, but it hasn’t yet arrived.)