http://seattle.metblogs.com/2008/04/02/surface-surfaces-but-not-in-seattle/ Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:32:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://seattle.metblogs.com/2008/04/02/surface-surfaces-but-not-in-seattle/comment-page-1/#comment-7176 tarabrown Fri, 04 Apr 2008 08:08:37 +0000 http://seattle.metblogs.com/2008/04/02/surface-surfaces-but-not-in-seattle/#comment-7176 I've seen some really exciting ways in which the Surface can be used. It has been demo'd around with more implementation ideas than just rotating and scaling pictures. I agree that AT&T was less than a thrilling choice for showing off its capabilities. Problem is getting places like restaurants to replace their tables and upgrade their POS systems to support Surface. It's all about the $$. I’ve seen some really exciting ways in which the Surface can be used. It has been demo’d around with more implementation ideas than just rotating and scaling pictures. I agree that AT&T was less than a thrilling choice for showing off its capabilities. Problem is getting places like restaurants to replace their tables and upgrade their POS systems to support Surface. It’s all about the $$.

]]> http://seattle.metblogs.com/2008/04/02/surface-surfaces-but-not-in-seattle/comment-page-1/#comment-7161 Ryan Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:17:19 +0000 http://seattle.metblogs.com/2008/04/02/surface-surfaces-but-not-in-seattle/#comment-7161 I'm assuming Surface is the same as <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89sz8ExZndc&eurl=http://tvforahead.com/" rel="nofollow">this</a>...? I’m assuming Surface is the same as this…?

]]>