http://seattle.metblogs.com/2008/03/06/wal-mart-and-starbucks-jump-to-your-own-conclusions/ Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:32:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://seattle.metblogs.com/2008/03/06/wal-mart-and-starbucks-jump-to-your-own-conclusions/comment-page-1/#comment-6980 Jeffery Simpson Fri, 07 Mar 2008 03:33:53 +0000 http://seattle.metblogs.com/2008/03/06/wal-mart-and-starbucks-jump-to-your-own-conclusions/#comment-6980 Vancouver has no Wal-Marts and about a billion Starbucks. If you cared. Vancouver has no Wal-Marts and about a billion Starbucks. If you cared.

]]> http://seattle.metblogs.com/2008/03/06/wal-mart-and-starbucks-jump-to-your-own-conclusions/comment-page-1/#comment-6976 Ryan Thu, 06 Mar 2008 17:43:25 +0000 http://seattle.metblogs.com/2008/03/06/wal-mart-and-starbucks-jump-to-your-own-conclusions/#comment-6976 That's the responsible way to interpret it. It's too bad Columbia didn't provide that explanation. That’s the responsible way to interpret it. It’s too bad Columbia didn’t provide that explanation.

]]> http://seattle.metblogs.com/2008/03/06/wal-mart-and-starbucks-jump-to-your-own-conclusions/comment-page-1/#comment-6975 rseattle Thu, 06 Mar 2008 17:34:22 +0000 http://seattle.metblogs.com/2008/03/06/wal-mart-and-starbucks-jump-to-your-own-conclusions/#comment-6975 This is just another urban vs rural comparison put into more consumerist terms. Walmart originally limited its growth to towns under a certain population. This is just another urban vs rural comparison put into more consumerist terms. Walmart originally limited its growth to towns under a certain population.

]]>