attendance at clinton’s pier 30 rally exceeded 5,000

photo by by joshc [flickr].
More than 5,000 people showed up at Pier 30 with just under a day’s notice to see Hillary Clinton, but there was no surprise endorsement by Christine Gregoire {update: she’s endorsing Obama today [slog]}. I couldn’t tell if everyone was able to get inside, but at some doors, they seemed to be turning people away. Nevertheless, the auditorium certainly felt packed and the crowd — an impressive cross section, demographically — was generally enthusiastic both in anticipation of her delayed arrival and in response to her speech, which focused heavily on environmentalism, green collar jobs, universal healthcare, veterans, and ending the war in Iraq.
More photos being uploaded now [flickr], stay tuned for a more thorough recap in the morning. recap posted below, will likely be edited this afternoon.
While waiting for Clinton arrival, the carefully selected demographically diverse background gaggle do their best to stay enthusiastic. “Life is a Highway” gives way to “Suddenly I See” which transitions into the Dixie Chicks’s “Ready to Run”. I didn’t notice even a note of Celine Dion; so it seems that clearer heads have prevailed and discarded last summer’s website victor in the campaign themesong nomniating process. As the music continues and the arrival becomes more delayed, the crew on the risers attempts to convince the rest of the auditorium to start the Wave. They are only mildly successful.
Excitement levels in the crowded hall seem high. There are a surprising number of children — young girls, in particular — scattered throughout. Parents with babies, a more than fair share of college age “kids”, and at least one older woman wearing a fuzzy chicken hat and a kid in a Clinton emblazoned yarmulke. Floating around, Clinton volunteers hold impromptu training sessions on the mechanics of caucusing, all the while trying to recruit precinct capatains. As people were turned away, there was a tense exchange near the press entrance about the fire marshall and scheduling. At one point the sirens started to throb and an announcement that there was no emergency was met with a round of applause. Temperatures were warm, and an ambulance crew had to cut through the crowd to evacuate a person who had lost consciousness.
Ron Sims, Gary Locke, and Jay Inslee each took a turn at warming up the crowd. Locke said that there was an emergency (Bush in the White House) and it was time or change. Some students in the audience gave high fives all around for Locke’s excitement of taxing the hell out of the rich. Sims mostly spent his time onstage reminding the audience of how to chant to welcome Hillary Clinton. Inslee said something about how if America can elect the single most incompetent president of all time, then surely we are ready to elect a woman. I wonder if this is really the best selling point, but the crowd didn’t seem to mind.
(Eli Sanders posted the full audio of the event [elisanders]; so below is a general outline with some highlights for the biggest applause lines.)
When she finally cut through the crowd and onto the stage, Clinton launched her speech with a long section about innovation in Washington and the way that so many local companies are creating environmentally friendly technologies. It seemed that someone on the flight over had been doing their homework, as Clinton referred to her notes and cited efforts at Boeing, as well as local entrepreneurs developing clean coal, carbon sequestration, photovoltaic cells, and biodiesel technologies. The section on clean, renewable, energy and a green collar jobs revolution to rival the space race consumed approximately the first third of the speech, with plenty of digs at the president (”none of this can happen until the oilmen are out of the white house”, “it is time to end George Bush’s war on Science” both got huge audience reactions).
Her most direct swipe at Obama came during the Health Care portion of her talk when she reinforced her commitment to mandating that every American have health coverage, framing this as a moral responsibility and not wanting to leave out millions and saying that her opponent had given up on that prospect. As Democrats, she asserted that we should be committed (”now and forever” to covering every single person.
The Iraq portion was anchored by a moving story of a captain who lost and arm and a finger (from a melting wedding band) in an explosion, who still suffers from traumatic brain injuries. Clinton proceeded to discuss the importance of thorough planning of the exit strategy to keep the civilians and “Iraqis who sided with us” safe as we withdraw now that “George Bush’s blank check is no longer valid” and rounded out the section by mentioning veterans — a “new GI bill” for new veterans, taking care of the people from her generation who fought in Vietnam, and of course making sure that “the Greatest Generation” is well cared for.
The event ended with Clinton talking about standing her ground, and aiming for unity not just for its own sake but for a purpose. She humorously expressed her dislike of caucuses [where she hasn't done as well, saying that they limit participation], expressing confusion over our meaningless primary, and pleading for support on Saturday saying “if you stand up for me on Saturday … I will stand up for you throughout this campaign … I will be a winning candidate in November, and together we will change our country and make history.”
Most of the crowd filtered as “American Girl” and “9 to 5″ were piped through the sound system; but more than a few swarmed to the front, hoping to get signatures or photos as Clinton stayed up front well after the conclusion of the rally.



They turned away atleast a 1000 people or more. The overflow was shoulder to shoulder packed. I got there 30 min before the event and it had already reached capacity.
I’m looking forward to your more thorough recap, Josh!
I like Clinton. I really do. If she’s the nominee, I’ll definitely vote for her. But I think Seth summed up nicely a big reason why I hope Obama wins the nomination.
Which part of that post are you referring to?
I agree that they’re both great candidates. It is a wonderful situation for democrats to find themselves facing. Ideologically, they are nearly identical. I like that Clinton seems like the sort of hyper-prepared over-achiever that loves knowing all of the details and implementation stuff. Obviously, campaign plans mean almost nothing once subjected to the legislative machinery, but the part where Obama and Clinton most is their healthcare plans. His disregard for the importance of mandates does cause me great concern about the rest of his policies.
However, I don’t buy the argument that because Republicans have trashed Clinton for years she’s more vulnerable in the general election. In fact, I fear the opposite. She’s made it this far under more than a decade of near-constant attacks and scrutiny. We have yet to see how Obama would fare under the right wing onslaught (his Senate race in Illinois was functionally unopposed given that he ran against an unpopular nutcase).
alex: Did you make it inside? I was surprised at how many people made it to such a weird location on such short notice. Very impressive. (But I have to conceded that it’s not as impressive as selling out Key Arena midday).
I think the part of Seth’s post that resonates most with me is this:
Given how close they are on policies, it’s their difference in approach that I respond to.
I have been asking myself, though, whether it’s naive to think Obama can actually do what he is proposing (w/r/t building consensus and lessening the rancor between the parties). I don’t know if he can. But I know I like the message a whole lot. So, I’m weighing the risk/reward of that approach. The risk is that he fails and it’s 4 years of bitter, rancorous nonsense which is what we’ve experienced most of our adult lives. The reward would be if he succeeds (even moderately) and some of the ugliness goes away. Granted, just having Bush out of office will help some of that ugliness go away.
With Clinton, I think she’d be a fine president. I think her argument that she’d be ready on day 1 is actually compelling (as much as I like to joke about the extent of it being that she’d know where the bathrooms are and the hallways lead). But I don’t think her approach - which I think you’d admit can be confrontational - would be as effective as Obama’s. And given the hatred some conservatives have for the Clinton family, and in particular Hillary, I worry that it would be 4 years of the aforementioned bitter, rancorous politics. Yes, she can withstand it but would her presidency be effective? And that’s if her nomination doesn’t prove to be the Ohio-gay-marriage of 2008 that drives voter turnout among the conservatives and loses her the election in the first place. So, I definitely worry about her electability. Also, and this isn’t a big concern but it’s something that I do think about, I’m not sure I like the idea of two families dominating the Executive Branch for up to 30 years. I don’t think that’s healthy for democracy (as highfalutin as that sounds).
Finally, you mentioned the health care plan. My worry there is that Clinton won’t be able to implement her plan. Even though I prefer hers, it’s definitely more radical than Obama’s and I think he stands the better chance of getting it through Congress.
All of this said, I’m not 100% sure that Clinton isn’t exactly who we need and that Obama isn’t going to be another Jimmy Carter. Maybe we need someone like Hillary to fight, fight, fight and Obama’s approach will fail miserably.
But, I’m caucusing for Obama because I buy into his message of hope. Though, if he wins the nomination and the presidency, my biggest hope will be that voting for him didn’t prove to be really naive.