<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Always</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seattle.metblogs.com/2007/08/07/always/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seattle.metblogs.com/2007/08/07/always/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:32:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MMTyler</title>
		<link>http://seattle.metblogs.com/2007/08/07/always/comment-page-1/#comment-5257</link>
		<dc:creator>MMTyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 14:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattle.metblogs.com/2007/08/07/always/#comment-5257</guid>
		<description>Just so&#039;s ya know, Always is the third Aud Torvingen book, after The Blue Place and Stay. It just happens to be the first Seattle book. I haven&#039;t read the other two yet (I will) but I think they&#039;re placed in Atlanta.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just so&#8217;s ya know, Always is the third Aud Torvingen book, after The Blue Place and Stay. It just happens to be the first Seattle book. I haven&#8217;t read the other two yet (I will) but I think they&#8217;re placed in Atlanta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mik</title>
		<link>http://seattle.metblogs.com/2007/08/07/always/comment-page-1/#comment-5256</link>
		<dc:creator>Mik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 13:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattle.metblogs.com/2007/08/07/always/#comment-5256</guid>
		<description>Wow.  Thanks for the book tip, I&#039;ll have to pick it up today.  Boston is very much a city of neighbourhoods, I loved living there.  Richmond, Virignia, not so much.  I&#039;m still relatively new to the Seattle area and so far have found West Seattle to be very much like you Nicola describes above, just on a smaller scale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  Thanks for the book tip, I&#8217;ll have to pick it up today.  Boston is very much a city of neighbourhoods, I loved living there.  Richmond, Virignia, not so much.  I&#8217;m still relatively new to the Seattle area and so far have found West Seattle to be very much like you Nicola describes above, just on a smaller scale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nicola griffith</title>
		<link>http://seattle.metblogs.com/2007/08/07/always/comment-page-1/#comment-5255</link>
		<dc:creator>nicola griffith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 18:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattle.metblogs.com/2007/08/07/always/#comment-5255</guid>
		<description>I think the neighbourhood thing has two main factors: the longer the city has been in place before the car came long, the more likely there is to be little villages within towns within cities.  And tightly knit ethnic groups form their own little villages.  So old, immigrant-rich cities like Boston, Chicago, New York have great &#039;hoods.  Seattle, tho&#039; it&#039;s relatively new, had a huge early Norwegian and Swedish population.  Cities that didn&#039;t get a lot of immigration and/or got torn down (or burnt) e.g. Atlanta--which is constantly being torn down, at least until very recently--are less neighbourhood-focused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the neighbourhood thing has two main factors: the longer the city has been in place before the car came long, the more likely there is to be little villages within towns within cities.  And tightly knit ethnic groups form their own little villages.  So old, immigrant-rich cities like Boston, Chicago, New York have great &#8216;hoods.  Seattle, tho&#8217; it&#8217;s relatively new, had a huge early Norwegian and Swedish population.  Cities that didn&#8217;t get a lot of immigration and/or got torn down (or burnt) e.g. Atlanta&#8211;which is constantly being torn down, at least until very recently&#8211;are less neighbourhood-focused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony B.</title>
		<link>http://seattle.metblogs.com/2007/08/07/always/comment-page-1/#comment-5254</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 17:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattle.metblogs.com/2007/08/07/always/#comment-5254</guid>
		<description>I had the same thoughts concerning Seattle being a &quot;city of neighborhoods&quot;.  Then I went to Chicago a couple of weeks ago and I think they are even more so than we are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the same thoughts concerning Seattle being a &#8220;city of neighborhoods&#8221;.  Then I went to Chicago a couple of weeks ago and I think they are even more so than we are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

