<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Viaduct&#8230; Still &#8211; Cary Moon Responds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seattle.metblogs.com/2007/01/05/the-viaduct-still-cary-moon-responds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seattle.metblogs.com/2007/01/05/the-viaduct-still-cary-moon-responds/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:32:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://seattle.metblogs.com/2007/01/05/the-viaduct-still-cary-moon-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-3489</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 02:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattle.metblogs.com/2007/01/05/the-viaduct-still-cary-moon-responds/#comment-3489</guid>
		<description>translation - now that it&#039;s unlikely we&#039;ll get our way, we will avail ourselves of the seattle process. please continue delaying a final decision while even more studies can be commissioned. never mind that we&#039;ve been advocating for our preferred solution knowing that it hadn&#039;t been studied properly &amp; are only now voicing such concerns.

---

i&#039;d also point out that the governor clearly made a decision - unless the city shows a proper funding plan for a tunnel, we&#039;re getting a new viaduct.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>translation &#8211; now that it&#8217;s unlikely we&#8217;ll get our way, we will avail ourselves of the seattle process. please continue delaying a final decision while even more studies can be commissioned. never mind that we&#8217;ve been advocating for our preferred solution knowing that it hadn&#8217;t been studied properly &amp; are only now voicing such concerns.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>i&#8217;d also point out that the governor clearly made a decision &#8211; unless the city shows a proper funding plan for a tunnel, we&#8217;re getting a new viaduct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

