<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Transit Now Is a Good Idea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seattle.metblogs.com/2006/07/31/why-transit-now-is-a-good-idea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seattle.metblogs.com/2006/07/31/why-transit-now-is-a-good-idea/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:15:38 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://seattle.metblogs.com/2006/07/31/why-transit-now-is-a-good-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-2688</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattle.metblogs.com/2006/07/31/why-transit-now-is-a-good-idea/#comment-2688</guid>
		<description>Bus rapid transit is meaningless without dedicated lanes.  The idea that buses will be more reliable by adding more of them to the same clogged roads is laughable.  By solidifying buses as our only transit option, we cut off the possibility of true in-city rapid transit.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bus rapid transit is meaningless without dedicated lanes.  The idea that buses will be more reliable by adding more of them to the same clogged roads is laughable.  By solidifying buses as our only transit option, we cut off the possibility of true in-city rapid transit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
