mossback, summarized

Having trouble making it through the troubled logic of this week’s “Mossback” column [#] in which the Seattle Weekly editor discusses his thoughts on saving Seattle Center by respecting its artificiality? Microsoft Word’s AutoSummarize “feature” comes to the rescue with a 15% synopsis:

Mossback loves Seattle Center but recognizes that it needs help. The driving one is this: Seattle Center is unique in that it was born from a world’s fair–1962’s Century 21 Exposition. Unlike most fairs, our city fathers saw the advantage of keeping the fair site largely intact. By remaining a precinct apart, Seattle Center can continue to maintain many of the qualities of a world’s fair. Like a world’s fair, it is a blend of public and commercial interests, featuring high-minded arts (theater, opera, gallery space) and low-brow entertainment (the Fun Forest). A refurbished Center must also avoid the yuppie trap. Every world’s fair, after all, is also part Puyallup Fair.

The major representative point that you miss with the condensation is a head-scratching equivocation about the polarizing Experience Music Project: “Love it or hate it, it is hard not to suggest that visitors spend an afternoon there.”

I don’t hate the EMP, but I’m wondering if there are other Seattle attractions that you hate and would recommend that your friends waste their time and money visiting?


Comments are closed.


Terms of use | Privacy Policy | Content: Creative Commons | Site and Design © 2009 | Metroblogging ® and Metblogs ® are registered trademarks of Bode Media, Inc.