<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: to execute or not to execute?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seattle.metblogs.com/2006/03/31/to-execute-or-not-to-execute/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seattle.metblogs.com/2006/03/31/to-execute-or-not-to-execute/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:15:38 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sarah irene</title>
		<link>http://seattle.metblogs.com/2006/03/31/to-execute-or-not-to-execute/comment-page-1/#comment-2083</link>
		<dc:creator>sarah irene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 14:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattle.metblogs.com/2006/03/31/to-execute-or-not-to-execute/#comment-2083</guid>
		<description>Like, say ... Ridgway?

I&#039;m with you here: some people do things for which they should die. I don&#039;t have an absolute moral position against killing, though perhaps I should.

For me, the key issue is is unfair and incorrect application -- due to mistakes, discrimination, etc. There is *no way* to manage the system so that the death penalty is imposed only when it is &quot;completely and totally justified&quot; (even if we could all agree on what that means).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like, say &#8230; Ridgway?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m with you here: some people do things for which they should die. I don&#8217;t have an absolute moral position against killing, though perhaps I should.</p>
<p>For me, the key issue is is unfair and incorrect application &#8212; due to mistakes, discrimination, etc. There is *no way* to manage the system so that the death penalty is imposed only when it is &#8220;completely and totally justified&#8221; (even if we could all agree on what that means).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://seattle.metblogs.com/2006/03/31/to-execute-or-not-to-execute/comment-page-1/#comment-2082</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 23:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattle.metblogs.com/2006/03/31/to-execute-or-not-to-execute/#comment-2082</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always put myself in the anti-death penalty camp, but only just barely.  The problem I always have is that no matter how much I&#039;m against it, I can always see that there might, just might, be a time when I would feel it is completely and totally justified to use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always put myself in the anti-death penalty camp, but only just barely.  The problem I always have is that no matter how much I&#8217;m against it, I can always see that there might, just might, be a time when I would feel it is completely and totally justified to use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
