<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: bumbershoot : weirdness (updated)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seattle.metblogs.com/2005/08/30/bumbershoot-weirdness-updated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seattle.metblogs.com/2005/08/30/bumbershoot-weirdness-updated/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:15:38 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: josh</title>
		<link>http://seattle.metblogs.com/2005/08/30/bumbershoot-weirdness-updated/comment-page-1/#comment-791</link>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2005 04:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattle.metblogs.com/2005/08/30/bumbershoot-weirdness-updated/#comment-791</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;david&lt;/b&gt;: they claimed that this was a &quot;new&quot; policy; so it wasn&#039;t completely insane to imagine that it would be enforced.

but as &lt;b&gt;ch&lt;/b&gt; points out -- it really was a rule that was ill-conceived and poorly implemented. I guess we&#039;ll see how it goes next year.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>david</b>: they claimed that this was a &#8220;new&#8221; policy; so it wasn&#8217;t completely insane to imagine that it would be enforced.</p>
<p>but as <b>ch</b> points out &#8212; it really was a rule that was ill-conceived and poorly implemented. I guess we&#8217;ll see how it goes next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mschuler</title>
		<link>http://seattle.metblogs.com/2005/08/30/bumbershoot-weirdness-updated/comment-page-1/#comment-790</link>
		<dc:creator>mschuler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2005 21:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattle.metblogs.com/2005/08/30/bumbershoot-weirdness-updated/#comment-790</guid>
		<description>I actually got to photograph Bumbershoot this year for a local newspaper and Sara et. al. were very accommodating, but I had a number of problems with the implementation of their photography policy.  In particular, the press packet said that a list of artists and their photography restrictions would be available, but it wasn&#039;t.  The staff monitoring the shows also were not informed about photography policy.  Finally, I was shooting using a very fast telephoto lens (Nikon 200mm F2) specifically to remain out-of-sight but there were more than a few people with point-and-shoots blatantly violating the no-flash-indoors reg. I don&#039;t have a problem with rules as long as they are thought-out and well-implemented.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually got to photograph Bumbershoot this year for a local newspaper and Sara et. al. were very accommodating, but I had a number of problems with the implementation of their photography policy.  In particular, the press packet said that a list of artists and their photography restrictions would be available, but it wasn&#8217;t.  The staff monitoring the shows also were not informed about photography policy.  Finally, I was shooting using a very fast telephoto lens (Nikon 200mm F2) specifically to remain out-of-sight but there were more than a few people with point-and-shoots blatantly violating the no-flash-indoors reg. I don&#8217;t have a problem with rules as long as they are thought-out and well-implemented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://seattle.metblogs.com/2005/08/30/bumbershoot-weirdness-updated/comment-page-1/#comment-789</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2005 12:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattle.metblogs.com/2005/08/30/bumbershoot-weirdness-updated/#comment-789</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t been to the last couple Bumbershoots, but I attended many in years prior, and was able to take photos pretty much anywhere. Next year, people, take your best camera and happily snap away. No security person will say anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t been to the last couple Bumbershoots, but I attended many in years prior, and was able to take photos pretty much anywhere. Next year, people, take your best camera and happily snap away. No security person will say anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Hanscom</title>
		<link>http://seattle.metblogs.com/2005/08/30/bumbershoot-weirdness-updated/comment-page-1/#comment-788</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hanscom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 13:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattle.metblogs.com/2005/08/30/bumbershoot-weirdness-updated/#comment-788</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just sent an e-mail to OneReel asking them to clarify just what &quot;professional quality&quot; camera equipment is. Sounds like a completely arbitrary and ridiculous distinction between point-and-shoots and (D)SLRs to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just sent an e-mail to OneReel asking them to clarify just what &#8220;professional quality&#8221; camera equipment is. Sounds like a completely arbitrary and ridiculous distinction between point-and-shoots and (D)SLRs to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh</title>
		<link>http://seattle.metblogs.com/2005/08/30/bumbershoot-weirdness-updated/comment-page-1/#comment-787</link>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 15:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattle.metblogs.com/2005/08/30/bumbershoot-weirdness-updated/#comment-787</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;patrick:&lt;/b&gt; I think the camera rule is new this year and I have no idea how well it will be enforced. I think it&#039;s really stupid. Maybe someone should organize a protest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>patrick:</b> I think the camera rule is new this year and I have no idea how well it will be enforced. I think it&#8217;s really stupid. Maybe someone should organize a protest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://seattle.metblogs.com/2005/08/30/bumbershoot-weirdness-updated/comment-page-1/#comment-786</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 00:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattle.metblogs.com/2005/08/30/bumbershoot-weirdness-updated/#comment-786</guid>
		<description>Thanks for alerting me on the camera thing. It&#039;ll be my first time attending since moving here recently, and f*ck if that doesn&#039;t make me pissed I can&#039;t take pics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for alerting me on the camera thing. It&#8217;ll be my first time attending since moving here recently, and f*ck if that doesn&#8217;t make me pissed I can&#8217;t take pics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: naiah</title>
		<link>http://seattle.metblogs.com/2005/08/30/bumbershoot-weirdness-updated/comment-page-1/#comment-785</link>
		<dc:creator>naiah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2005 22:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattle.metblogs.com/2005/08/30/bumbershoot-weirdness-updated/#comment-785</guid>
		<description>&quot;our collective...agenda&quot; sounds so delightfully subversive...
Mwahahaha!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;our collective&#8230;agenda&#8221; sounds so delightfully subversive&#8230;<br />
Mwahahaha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
